[The usual research and recommendations here.]
When we first started this FEASIBILITY STUDY we thought we knew most of the people who could benefit from a regular homeless shelter. We had stayed at and studied the 6 biggest homeless shelters in our fine state.
We knew they needed food, clothing and shleter. At the big city shelters this is what they provide in a highly efficient, high-volume, barracks-style environment. The Hard Living "nighttime" cycle begins as they:
* Are taken in around 5pm and assigned a bed #,
* Must attend a chapel service @6pm before they can
* Eat @6:30pm cafeteria-style (one entree, one vegetable, bread, dessert and choice of tea or coffee to drink).
* From 7-8pm they must take showers,
* Be in bed for "lights out" at 9pm.
* Wake-up call @ 5:30am,
* Breakfast from 6-6:30am, then
* Must be out of the shelter (with ALL their belongings) by 7am.
Then their "daytime" cycle starts . . .
During the day, most of these people go:
* To their regular, minimum wage job,
* On an all-day job search,
* Kids go to public school, day care or hang out with their parent(s),
* To the Salvation Army "Day Room" to:
> Make free local phone calls for work or documentation,
> Use laundry to wash clothes,
> Get a donut & coffee lunch.
* To other charitable organizations for:
> More food, canned or convenient-to-eat,
> Better clothing for job search,
> Any available help or monies.
* To their regular hang-outs to:
> Be with their friends,
> Drink alcohol or do drugs,
> Sit alone and think.
* To the bus station just to ride around town (on tokens) and see the sights,
* To the public library to read,
* Dumpster diving for food or stuff to sell/pawn
* Other places, other things.
Til it's time to return to the shelter, to start THAT cycle all over again...